Case 1804894/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr AJ Burnett v John Brendan Philbin AT A HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 1804894/2023
- Decision date
- 8 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr AJ Burnett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds by CVP on 7 November 2023 before Employment Judge Lancaster. The claimant, Mr AJ Burnett, appeared in person. The respondent, John Brendan Philbin, entered no appearance and did not attend.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's wages claim. It found that the respondent had made a series of unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. On that basis, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £2,447.76.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No further factual findings or legal reasoning are set out in the written judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made a series of unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £2,447.76. | Upheld | — | £2,448 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,448
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.