Case 1804904/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Talbot v Astrea Academy Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 1804904/2025
- Decision date
- 11 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Talbot
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs N Talbot’s application for interim relief was heard at Hull by video on 11 August 2025 before Employment Judge Miller. The respondent was Astrea Academy Trust. The written judgment records that the application was dismissed.
The decision is limited to the interim relief application. It states that the application was made in respect of a claim presented to the Tribunal on 22 July 2025, but it does not set out the underlying substantive allegations in the written record provided here. No substantive findings on liability appear in the text beyond the dismissal of the interim relief application.
The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by a party within 14 days of the sending of the written record. No monetary remedy was awarded in the written record.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment dismisses the claimant’s application for interim relief in respect of a claim presented on 22 July 2025. The written record does not identify the underlying substantive claim in more detail. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.