Case 1804916/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Porter v Greenways Property and Developments Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1804916/2019
- Decision date
- 4 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robertson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Porter
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting under Rule 21, held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £389.97 gross, being the amount of the unauthorised deductions found due.
The claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was struck out because he did not have the required period of two years' employment with the respondent to qualify for the right not to be unfairly dismissed. The judgment records that the hearing listed for 17 January 2020 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £389.97 gross. | Upheld | — | £390 |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal complaint was struck out because the claimant did not have two years' employment with the respondent and therefore was not entitled to the right not to be unfairly dismissed. | Struck out | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £390
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- two years' employment
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.