Case 1804928/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Dente v Preventx Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1804928/2021
- Decision date
- 17 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Dente
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 27 September 2021 and the respondent did not present a valid response in time. The tribunal therefore proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and determined the claim without a response from the respondent.
The Employment Judge found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages in relation to an unpaid bonus. The judgment ordered the respondent to pay Miss S Dente £1,042.34 gross. The same figure is stated as the total amount payable under the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined on a Rule 21 basis after the respondent failed to present a valid response or apply for an extension of time. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages in relation to an unpaid bonus and ordered payment of £1,042.34 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,042 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,042
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.