Case 1804933/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Hall v Unison Heard at Leeds by CVP — 2024
- Case reference
- 1804933/2023
- Decision date
- 2 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr T Downes, Mr D Eales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Hall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 30 September, 1 and 2 October 2024 at Leeds by CVP before Employment Judge Davies, with Mr T Downes and Mr D Eales sitting as lay members, the tribunal recorded that the parties had reached terms of settlement. The judgment itself does not set out any findings on liability for the underlying claims.
The order gave liberty to apply by 13 November 2024. It stated that if no application was made by that date, the claim would be dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. No monetary award or other remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the parties reached terms of settlement. It does not contain any merits findings or award; it states that if no application was made by 13 November 2024, the claim would be dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Settled | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the parties reached terms of settlement. It does not contain any merits findings or award; it states that if no application was made by 13 November 2024, the claim would be dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.