Case 1804939/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Woodmass v Pts Sa Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804939/2019
- Decision date
- 7 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Representation
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Woodmass
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Hull on 7 January 2020 found that Pts Sa Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Mr S Woodmass's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £600.43 for unpaid wages and a further £26.25 deducted for reimbursement of a train fare.
The tribunal also dealt with a breach of contract claim for further damages, but held that the claimant was not entitled to recover any additional amount because he had fully mitigated his losses. No discrimination or dismissal claims were recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £600.43 for unpaid wages and £26.25 deducted for reimbursement of a train fare. | Upheld | — | £627 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was not entitled to any further damages because he had fully mitigated his losses. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £627
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.