Case 1804939/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Towers First v John and Ruth Pell T/A Jack Doors — 2023
- Case reference
- 1804939/2022
- Decision date
- 6 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Towers First
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D Towers' claims against John and Ruth Pell T/A Jack Doors were heard at Leeds by CVP on 6 February 2023 before Employment Judge Shepherd. The respondent did not attend. The judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim was well-founded and succeeded, with an award of £8,573.00.
The tribunal also upheld claims for outstanding holiday pay (£88.00), unauthorised deduction from wages (£1,262.66 gross), and breach of contract, described as notice pay (£414.33 gross). In addition, the judgment records an award of £1,657.32 for failure to provide written particulars of terms of employment. The total amount ordered to be paid to the claimant was £11,995.31.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was well-founded and succeeds, with an award of £8,573.00. | Upheld | — | £8,573 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the outstanding holiday pay claim was well-founded and succeeds, with an award of £88.00. | Upheld | — | £88 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the unauthorised deduction from wages claim was well-founded and succeeds, with an award of £1,262.66 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,263 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the breach of contract claim for notice pay was well-founded and succeeds, with an award of £414.33 gross. | Upheld | — | £414 |
| Other | The judgment records an award for failure to provide written particulars of terms of employment, but does not identify a separate statutory claim label in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | £1,657 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,995
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.