Case 1804956/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Jheinga v Davymarkham Limited (in administration) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1804956/2018
- Decision date
- 22 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Jheinga
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Brain, sitting alone at Leeds on 12 July 2019, determined the claims brought by Mr B Jheinga against Davymarkham Ltd (in administration). The respondent did not attend or take part in the hearing.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's protective award complaint under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It held that, because an independent trade union was recognised by the employer, section 188(1B) meant the complaint could not be brought individually by the claimant. The note records that he fell within the description of employees covered by the separate judgment in case 1805671/2018 (Unite the Union v Davymarkham Ltd (in administration)).
The tribunal upheld the unlawful deduction from wages complaint and found £5,916 gross due, subject to credit for £1,956 received from the National Insurance Fund, leaving £3,960 gross payable. It also upheld the claim for accrued annual leave untaken at termination and recorded £2,400 gross due, subject to credit for £1,119.10 received from the National Insurance Fund, with the judgment stating a balance of £1,281.90 gross.
The breach of contract complaint succeeded because the respondent had not paid expenses incurred by the claimant in the course of his employment, and £1,597.31 was ordered to be paid. The judgment directed that the payments under paragraphs 2 to 4 were to be paid on or before 26 July 2019.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award claim under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 dismissed because section 188(1B) meant the claimant had no standing to pursue it individually; the judgment notes that he would benefit from the separate Unite judgment in case 1805671/2018. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages of £5,916 gross, credited £1,956 received from the National Insurance Fund, and ordered the balance of £3,960 gross to be paid. | Upheld | — | £3,960 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued annual leave untaken at the effective date of termination; the tribunal stated £2,400 gross was due, credited £1,119.10 from the National Insurance Fund, and ordered the balance of £1,281.90 gross. The stated balance appears arithmetically inconsistent with the figures given, so confidence is slightly reduced. | Upheld | — | £1,282 |
| Breach of contract | The respondent failed to pay expenses incurred by the claimant in the course of his employment, and the tribunal ordered payment of £1,597.31. | Upheld | — | £1,597 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,839
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 188(1B) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.