Case 1804960/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Evans & others (see Schedule) v Vision On Display Limited (In Voluntary Liquidation) AT A HEARING — 2020
- Case reference
- 1804960/2019
- Decision date
- 3 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Evans & others (see Schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds on 3 February 2020 before Employment Judge Lancaster. The respondent did not enter an appearance and did not attend. The written record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days.
The tribunal upheld the claims for a protective award. It ordered each claimant remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 22 July 2019. The order also stated that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefit) Regulations 1996, regulations 6, 7 and 8, applied to the award, so any payment was subject to the recoupment process and only the balance remaining after any recoupment notice would be payable directly to the claimants.
The claims for unauthorised deductions from wages were dismissed upon withdrawal. No separate monetary figure is stated in the written record for the protective award, and no further reasoning is set out beyond the orders recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim succeeded; the tribunal ordered each claimant remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 22 July 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claims for unauthorised deductions from wages were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.