Case 1804961/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Squires v Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 1804961/2023
- Decision date
- 11 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Squires
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Leeds, before Employment Judge Shepherd, heard the case on 9, 10 and 11 April 2024. The judgment records that Mr S Squires brought claims of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal against Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council.
The tribunal held that both claims were not well-founded and dismissed them. The written judgment does not set out the tribunal's reasons, because it records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the judgment.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment. The decision is therefore a dismissal of both pleaded claims, with no further remedy or separate findings set out in the written record provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim for breach of contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.