Case 1804978/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A North v EEV management Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1804978/2022
- Decision date
- 13 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A North
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal made a Rule 21 determination after the claim was issued on 16 September 2022 and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge decided that the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined under rule 21.
The claimant was given permission to amend the claim to include unpaid holiday pay. The Tribunal declared that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £4,903.52. It also found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £475.00.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £4,904 |
| Holiday pay | The claimant was given permission to amend the claim to include unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £475 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,379
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.