Case 1805013/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Hollings v Priestley Construction Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805013/2021
- Decision date
- 11 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Hollings
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 22 September 2021. The respondent, Priestley Construction Limited, failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal declared that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It awarded Mr R Hollings £2,377.48 gross, and stated that the respondent must pay him £2,377.48 in total. The hearing listed for 22 November 2021 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £2,377 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,377
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.