Case 1805016/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M G Thompson v Apater UK Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805016/2022
- Decision date
- 25 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M G Thompson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 28 September 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response, and the Employment Judge determined the matter under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 30 November 2022 was cancelled.
The tribunal held that Apater UK Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Mr M G Thompson's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £60,000 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £4,410.00 for that issue. The total monetary award recorded in the judgment is £64,410.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £60,000. | Upheld | — | £60,000 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £4,410.00. | Upheld | — | £4,410 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £64,410
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.