Case 1805026/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Amadeusz Wilbik v Kayas York Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1805026/2020
- Decision date
- 4 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kate Armstrong
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Amadeusz Wilbik
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Kayas York Ltd had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages because it failed to pay him for a week of notice given. It ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £382.81 in respect of that deduction.
The tribunal also ordered the respondent to pay £543.97 for holiday pay accrued but untaken at the termination of the claimant's employment. No separate split of the award was given beyond those two sums.
The claimant's redundancy payment claim was dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment does not record any discrimination issue or any other legal test beyond the short findings on wages, holiday pay, and withdrawal of the redundancy claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant for a week of notice given and ordered payment of the gross sum of £382.81 in respect of the unlawful deduction. | Upheld | — | £383 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of £543.97 for holiday pay accrued but untaken at the termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £544 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the redundancy payment claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £927
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.