Case 1805030/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v NMCN plc (in administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805030/2021
- Decision date
- 15 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in time on 24 September 2021. The respondent entered administration on or around 6 October 2021 and the claim was stayed. The administrators later consented to the proceedings continuing, but no response or application for extra time was filed. On that basis, Employment Judge JM Wade issued a Rule 21 judgment on 15 December 2022.
The tribunal found that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal and victimisation by dismissal succeeded. It made a basic award of £12,240 and a compensatory award of £500 for loss of statutory rights. It also awarded past pecuniary damages and pension loss of £34,000, future pecuniary damages of £10,400, injury to feelings of £5,000, and interest of £2,040 on the above sum plus £600 on the injury-to-feelings award.
The judgment states a total award of £59,780 and says the recoupment regulations do not apply. The extracted text does not apportion the monetary awards between the two successful claims, and the itemised figures in the text do not fully reconcile with the stated total.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Succeeded under a Rule 21 judgment. The monetary awards were not split between this claim and the victimisation claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Victimisation | Succeeded by dismissal. The extracted text does not identify the protected characteristic underpinning the victimisation claim, and the awards were not apportioned between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £59,780
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £12,240
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.