Case 1805047/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Brian Cook v Country Park Inn — 2020
- Case reference
- 1805047/2019
- Decision date
- 4 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dr
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Brian Cook
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe matter was heard at Hull on 19 December 2019 before Employment Judge Dr E Morgan. The claimant, Mr Brian Cook, appeared in person and the respondent, Country Park Inn Ltd, was represented by its director, Mr Ciufetelli.
The claimant's breach of contract claim, unlawful deduction from wages claim, and claim for accrued but unpaid holiday entitlement under the Working Time Regulations 1998 were each dismissed upon withdrawal. The judgment therefore records no merits findings on those claims and no monetary award in the claimant's favour.
The respondent's claim for damages for breach of contract was dismissed. The judgment contains no further reasons beyond the disposals recorded in the order.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claimant's breach of contract claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant's unlawful deduction from wages claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant's claim for accrued but unpaid holiday entitlement under the Working Time Regulations 1998 was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's claim for damages for breach of contract was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.