Case 1805050/2019 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance For the v Estabulo Group — 2019
- Case reference
- 1805050/2019
- Decision date
- 14 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No attendance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented complaints on 24 September 2019, but the claim form was not fully completed and no response was received from the respondent. A preliminary hearing was arranged for 14 November 2019 in Leeds, and an interpreter was arranged after the claimant applied for one in October.
The claimant did not attend the hearing and did not make contact with the tribunal. The judge noted that the clerk had tried to contact him by email and telephone, but there was no response. The judge considered whether to make an unless order requiring an explanation for the absence, but decided that this would cause further delay and expense.
The tribunal concluded that the likely position was that the claimant did not pursue the claim and did not wish to attend. In those circumstances, the judge exercised the discretion under Rule 47 and dismissed the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, age discrimination, notice pay and holiday pay. No substantive merits findings or monetary award were made.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend or have representation at the preliminary hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | Dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend or have representation at the preliminary hearing. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to the claimant's complaint of notice pay and dismisses it under Rule 47 for non-attendance. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to the claimant's complaint of holiday pay and dismisses it under Rule 47 for non-attendance. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.