| Whistleblowing | The section 47B public interest disclosure detriment complaint was struck out only as against the twelfth respondent, Ms T Boville, on the basis that the allegation against her concerned dismissal and had no reasonable prospect of success. No deposit order was made on the remaining section 47B complaint at this stage, with further particulars ordered separately. | Other | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The section 103A unfair dismissal complaint was not struck out or determined. The tribunal recorded that the individual respondents were not respondents to this complaint, which could be pursued only against the employer. No deposit order was made at this stage. | Other | — | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The complaint of unlawful religion or belief discrimination was struck out under rule 37(1)(a) as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | Religion or belief | — |
| Race discrimination | The respondent's application for a deposit order was refused. The tribunal held that the race discrimination allegation involved factual disputes requiring evidence and could not be said to have little reasonable prospect of success at this stage. | Other | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The respondent's application for a deposit order was refused after the claimant explained the allegation at the hearing. The tribunal ordered proper particulars separately and held that factual evidence would be required. | Other | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | The victimisation complaint, linked to grievances following the alleged sex discrimination incident, was not struck out and no deposit order was made. Further particulars were ordered separately. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claim form indicated disability discrimination, but the tribunal noted that the details of claim contained no particulars. The judgment did not determine the disability discrimination complaint and ordered further particulars separately. | Other | Disability | — |