Case 1805085/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Owens v Mr Olu Femiola trading as Manor Park Care Home — 2018
- Case reference
- 1805085/2018
- Decision date
- 22 August 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Owens
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs J Owens brought claims against Mr Olu Femiola trading as Manor Park Care Home. At a hearing in Leeds on 22 August 2018 before Employment Judge Cox, the tribunal found that the unfair dismissal claim succeeded and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant compensation of £734.75 in respect of that dismissal.
The judgment also records that the separate claim for damages for breach of the contractual right to notice of termination failed and was dismissed. The extracted judgment text does not set out detailed reasons for either outcome, but it records the final determination and the compensation awarded on the successful unfair dismissal claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim succeeded; the tribunal ordered compensation of £734.75 in respect of the unfair dismissal. | Upheld | — | £735 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for damages for breach of the contractual right to notice of termination was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £735
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £735
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.