Case 1805088/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J George v A and S Leisure Group Ltd t/a Napoleons Casino HELD BY CVP in Sheffield — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805088/2019
- Decision date
- 12 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Little Members
- Panel members
- Mrs S Robinson, Ms V M Griggs
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J George
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr J George was not, at the material time, a person with a disability within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010. On that basis, it held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the complaints of alleged failure to make reasonable adjustments or discrimination arising from disability.
Those disability-related complaints were therefore dismissed. The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal. No monetary award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found the claimant was not, at the material time, a person with a disability within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010. It therefore held it had no jurisdiction to hear complaints of alleged failure to make reasonable adjustments or discrimination arising from disability, and dismissed those complaints. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal complaint failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.