Case 1805088/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Miss B Jacks v The Vital Element (UK) Limited — 2022

Case reference: 1805088/2021
Decision date: 14 July 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge McAvoy Newns

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss B Jacks

Respondent

The Vital Element (UK) Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a case management preliminary hearing on 24 June 2022 before Employment Judge McAvoy Newns, the claimant withdrew her claim for constructive unfair dismissal. The tribunal dismissed that claim on withdrawal.

The claimant also withdrew her notice pay claim, her holiday pay claim, and her claim for unauthorised deductions from wages. Each of those claims was dismissed on withdrawal. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.

No substantive liability findings were made and no monetary remedy was awarded.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Constructive dismissal	Constructive unfair dismissal claim dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.	Dismissed	—	—
Breach of contract	Notice pay claim dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.	Dismissed	—	—
Holiday pay	Holiday pay claim dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.	Dismissed	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	Claim for unauthorised deductions from wages dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.