Case 1805090/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Colley v Attis Insurance Brokers Ltd HELD in Sheffield by CVP — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805090/2023
- Decision date
- 28 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Colley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the open preliminary hearing on 19 February 2024 before Employment Judge Brain, the tribunal held that Mrs K Colley’s Equality Act 2010 claims had been presented outside the limitation period in section 123 of the Act. The judgment records that the claims were therefore time-barred on their face.
The tribunal then found it just and equitable to extend time to 28 August 2023, which gave the Tribunal jurisdiction to consider the Equality Act claims. The hearing did not determine the substantive merits of any discrimination complaint and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal found the Equality Act 2010 claims had been presented outside the section 123 limitation period, but it was just and equitable to extend time to 28 August 2023 so the Tribunal had jurisdiction to consider them. No substantive merits decision was made. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.