Case 1805110/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Inside Access Limited (sued as Vanessa Laithwaite) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1805110/2019
- Decision date
- 19 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under Rule 21 after the respondent did not present a response. The tribunal noted that the claim had been posted to the respondent’s Leeds operating address on 4 October 2019, that no response had been received by 19 November 2019, and that there was sufficient information on the file to give judgment.
The claimant’s complaint of unlawful deductions from wages succeeded. The tribunal recorded that the respondent was to pay the claimant the net sum of £951.60, which was the amount recorded on his payslip but not paid.
The judgment does not record any separate split between different heads of loss or any additional remedy beyond the sum of £951.60. It also notes that a copy of the judgment should be sent to the respondent’s registered office for information.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment entered because the respondent did not present a response; the tribunal found the claimant was owed the net sum recorded on his payslip but not paid. | Upheld | — | £952 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £952
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.