Case 1805110/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v J Bruce and D O’Brien (formerly T/a Sunny Diva’s) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805110/2020
- Decision date
- 12 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr Samir Ayadi, gave unchallenged evidence and the respondents did not file a response or attend. Employment Judge Drake accepted that he had worked 14 days between 13 July 2020 and 5 August 2020, that he was contracted to work at least five hours per day at £6.45 per hour, and that he had been paid for all days worked except the last three days.
For that period, the tribunal found that 15 hours of work had not been paid and that this amounted to an unlawful withholding of wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Judgment was entered for £96.75, described as unpaid wages for 3 to 5 August 2020.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed on 5 August 2020, when the cafe premises in Sheffield were abruptly closed and he was not offered work at the respondents' other premises in Barnsley. Because he had been employed for less than a year, he was entitled to one week's notice, but he received neither notice nor pay in lieu.
On that basis, the tribunal upheld the breach of contract claim for notice pay and awarded £153.75, representing 25 hours' pay he would have earned during the notice period. The total award was £250.50, payable on a joint and several liability basis.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful withholding of three days' pay under section 13 ERA 1996 for 3 August to 5 August 2020, said to cover 15 hours at £6.45 per hour. | Upheld | — | £97 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim for one week's notice not given or paid in lieu; tribunal awarded 25 hours' pay at £6.45 per hour. | Upheld | — | £154 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £251
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.