Case 1805127/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Dooman May Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1805127/2019
- Decision date
- 19 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms F Cooper, brought a complaint of unlawful deductions from wages against Dooman May Ltd. The tribunal recorded that the proceedings were posted to the respondent’s operating address and to the correspondence address of its director on 10 October 2019, with a response due by 7 November 2019, and that by 19 November 2019 no response had been received. The tribunal said there was sufficient information on the file to give judgment under Rule 21.
The claimant’s unlawful deductions from wages complaint succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay her the gross sum of £1,386.29. The judgment does not set out any further factual findings, apportionment, or separate remedy components beyond that gross award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment entered after the respondent did not present a response; the tribunal awarded the claimant the gross sum of £1,386.29. | Upheld | — | £1,386 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,386
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.