Case 1805138/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Train v DHL Services Limited sued as DHL Supply Chain — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805138/2021
- Decision date
- 20 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moxon Representation
- Venue
- Leeds via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Train
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr J Train was unfairly dismissed by DHL Services Limited, which was sued as DHL Supply Chain and had its name amended by consent. The judgment records only one substantive claim: unfair dismissal under the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claim succeeded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal complaint under the Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondent was ordered to pay a basic award of £10,502.35 after a 10% reduction for the claimant's conduct, and a compensatory award of £495 after a 10% ACAS uplift and a 10% reduction for contributory conduct. | Upheld | — | £10,997 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,997
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £10,502
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £495
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- Polkey v AE Dayton Services Limited
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.