Case 1805149/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Dunne v Rotherwood (1976) Limited (In Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805149/2020
- Decision date
- 17 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Dunne
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the case by consent after reading an email from the claimant's solicitor dated 8 February 2021 and an email from the respondent's solicitor dated 24 February 2021. The judgment records that the claimant's claims succeed and that the case was vacated from the hearing list for 13 April 2021.
The tribunal ordered the respondent, Rotherwood (1976) Limited (In Administration), to pay the claimant £25,793.26. That sum was said to be calculated in accordance with the schedule of loss annexed to the judgment.
The judgment does not set out findings of fact or legal reasoning on the substantive claims, and it does not break the award down between the individual heads of claim. It is therefore best understood as a consent judgment recording agreed success and agreed remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not identify the individual heads of claim, but the GOV.UK listing for this case included breach of contract and the tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims succeed by consent. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify the individual heads of claim, but the GOV.UK listing for this case included unfair dismissal and the tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims succeed by consent. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify the individual heads of claim, but the GOV.UK listing for this case included unlawful deduction from wages and the tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims succeed by consent. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £25,793
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.