Case 1805163/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Stoker v Kerbedge Restaurants Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 1805163/2018
- Decision date
- 11 June 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Keevash Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Stoker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy judgment dated 11 June 2018 under Rule 21, Employment Judge Keevash entered judgment for Mr L Stoker against Kerbedge Restaurants Ltd and cancelled the hearing listed for 14 June 2018. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,800 plus £348 in respect of additional financial loss attributable to that deduction.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £612 gross. It rejected the claimant's request for £1,625 compensation for loss of earnings, stating that there was no basis on which that could be awarded. The monetary awards therefore totalled £2,760.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,800 gross plus £348 in respect of additional financial loss attributable to that deduction. | Upheld | — | £2,148 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £612 gross. | Upheld | — | £612 |
| Other | The claimant's request for £1,625 compensation for loss of earnings was rejected because there was no basis on which it could be awarded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,760
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,760
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.