Case 1805164/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B Lubanska v Ideal Recruit Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805164/2022
- Decision date
- 23 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B Lubanska
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a Preliminary Hearing on 17 January 2023, the Tribunal told Mrs B Lubanska that it proposed to strike out her unfair dismissal claim because she had not completed the two years' service normally required to bring such a claim. The claimant was given until 7 February 2023 to comment on that proposal.
In response, the claimant said she believed she could bring the claim because she had been dismissed after being deprived of a right to be accompanied at a disciplinary hearing and of access to the respondent's disciplinary rules and procedures. The Tribunal considered section 104 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, but held that the right to be accompanied at a disciplinary hearing under sections 10 and 11 of the Employment Relations Act 1999 is not one of the relevant statutory rights relied on by section 104.
The Tribunal also considered section 12 of the Employment Relations Act 1999. It found that, on the information provided, the claimant had not requested to be accompanied by a co-worker or trade union official, and the respondent had not refused such accompaniment. The postponement she sought was so that she could be accompanied by a legal representative and an interpreter. The claim was therefore struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success because the claimant had not completed the service needed to qualify to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was struck out at a Preliminary Hearing because the Tribunal found it had no reasonable prospect of success in light of the claimant's length of service. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 104 Employment Rights Act 1996
- sections 10, 11 and 12 Employment Relations Act 1999
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.