Case 1805166/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Bagameri v Simply Desserts Yorkshire Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1805166/2020
- Decision date
- 12 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McAvoy Newns
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Bagameri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant, Mr S Bagameri, brought claims against Simply Desserts Yorkshire Limited. The judgment records that the Claimant’s holiday pay claim was dismissed because it was withdrawn by the Claimant. No separate monetary award was made on that claim.
The tribunal also found that the Respondent had failed to provide, in accordance with section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, an itemised pay statement detailing the holiday pay the Claimant received on 10 November 2020. The tribunal made a declaration to that effect pursuant to section 12(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment does not record any monetary remedy or further relief beyond that declaration.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claimant withdrew the holiday pay claim; the tribunal dismissed it on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The tribunal declared that the Respondent failed to provide, under section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, an itemised pay statement detailing the holiday pay received on 10 November 2020, and made the declaration under section 12(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 8 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 12(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.