Case 1805171/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Slavin v Syd Colman Tyre And Motor Co Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805171/2023
- Decision date
- 4 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Slavin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 25 September 2023. The respondent presented a response but indicated that it did not defend the claim. The Employment Judge therefore determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that Mr P Slavin was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £12,033. The judgment states that the figure was calculated on the basis of 15 years' continuous service, with 12 years over the age of 41 and 3 years under, and a final gross weekly wage of £573. The hearing listed for 20 November 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The respondent indicated it did not defend the claim. The tribunal determined the claim under Rule 21 and found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £12,033. | Upheld | — | £12,033 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,033
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.