Case 1805175/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Ambrose & others (see attached schedule) v STA Travel Limited (in liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805175/2020
- Decision date
- 11 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley On
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Ambrose & others (see attached schedule)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not enter a response and did not attend the hearing. The Tribunal dismissed duplicate claims brought as part of Miss Dennis' claim form relating to Miss J Ambrose, Miss Claire Atkinson and Miss B Carter.
The Tribunal found that it was not reasonably practicable for Miss Dennis to submit her claim within the relevant time limits under s192 TULRCA, and that she brought it within a reasonable period after the time limit expired.
For all claimants except Mr Alan Fletcher and Mr Paul Wilkinson, the Tribunal declared well-founded the claims that the respondent failed to comply with the requirements of s188 TULRCA. It made a protective award of 90 days' pay for those claimants, who were dismissed as redundant with effect from 2 September 2020. The judgment did not determine Mr Fletcher's and Mr Wilkinson's claims because they appeared to have been submitted out of time, with a separate case management order to follow.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim for failure to comply with s188 TULRCA in relation to redundancy dismissals. The judgment applied to all claimants except Mr Alan Fletcher and Mr Paul Wilkinson; duplicate claims within Miss Dennis' claim form were dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s192 TULRCA
- s188 TULRCA
- not reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.