Case 1805193/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Riot Hair and Beauty Clinics Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1805193/2019
- Decision date
- 26 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Little REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Sana Khan brought claims against Riot Hair and Beauty Clinics Limited for unauthorised deduction from wages and for accrued but untaken holiday pay. The respondent did not attend the hearing and no response was presented.
The tribunal upheld both complaints. It found that £480.25 had been unlawfully deducted from wages by non-payment, and it also found that £423.64 was due for accrued but untaken holiday pay.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant a total of £903.89 forthwith. No separate legal test, lay members, or additional remedy components were recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages by non-payment and found £480.25 was unlawfully deducted. | Upheld | — | £480 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal also upheld the complaint for accrued but untaken holiday pay and awarded £423.64. | Upheld | — | £424 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £904
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.