Case 1805196/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Darcy v Burlington Care Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805196/2020
- Decision date
- 9 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Darcy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal struck out the claimant's complaint of victimisation because she failed to comply with the deposit order made on 9 November 2020. The judgment is limited to that strike-out decision and does not contain findings on the underlying merits of the victimisation allegation.
The judgment states that the claimant's complaint of direct age discrimination was unaffected by the order and therefore remained live. No remedy was awarded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | Struck out because the claimant failed to comply with the deposit order made on 9 November 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.