Case 1805225/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Kevin Jackson v Collett Holdings Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805225/2021
- Decision date
- 21 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barrett Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Kevin Jackson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Kevin Jackson was dismissed by Collett Holdings Limited, and the dismissal decision was communicated in a recorded-delivery letter he received and read on 8 March 2021. He considered the dismissal unfair and contacted ACAS on 29 April 2021, which issued an early conciliation certificate the same day. The tribunal calculated that the three-month time limit expired on 8 June 2021, allowing for one day of ACAS early conciliation, but the ET1 was not received until 5 October 2021.
The tribunal applied section 111 ERA 1996 and considered whether it was "reasonably practicable" for the claim to have been presented in time, referring to Palmer v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council and Walls Meat Co Ltd v Khan. It found that it was reasonably practicable for Mr Jackson to submit the claim by the deadline. In particular, he had access to the internet, could have asked a colleague who was pursuing an employment tribunal case, and could have contacted the tribunal earlier to find out how to submit the ET1.
The tribunal also found that any delay in receiving the paper ET1 form was not the reason the deadline was missed, because Mr Jackson did not contact the tribunal until at least three weeks after the time limit had already expired. He told the tribunal that there was no physical reason why he could not submit the form and nothing else he could say that would explain the delay. The unfair dismissal complaint was therefore out of time, the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it, and the claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Presented outside the statutory time limit. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the claim by 8 June 2021, so it lacked jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Palmer v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council
- Walls Meat Co Ltd v Khan
- reasonably practicable test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.