Case 1805234/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Langley v Yorkshire Wildlife Park Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1805234/2019
- Decision date
- 18 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Langley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Miss T Langley had been ordered to pay a deposit of £200 following a preliminary hearing on 5 March 2020. The order was sent to her on 9 March 2020, but she failed to pay the deposit.
Because the deposit was not paid, the tribunal struck out both the unfair dismissal claim and the claim for discrimination because of something arising from her disability under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No substantive findings on liability were made and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rule 39(4) because the claimant failed to pay the £200 deposit ordered after the preliminary hearing on 5 March 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment describes this as discrimination because of something arising from her disability; it was struck out under rule 39(4) because the claimant did not pay the £200 deposit. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.