Case 1805236/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Compa v Yorkshire Grown Produce Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805236/2021
- Decision date
- 28 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller
- Venue
- Hull
- Panel members
- Mr G Corbett, Mr W Roberts
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Compa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningCase number 1805236/2021 was heard at Hull on 28 October 2022 before Employment Judge Miller sitting with Mr G Corbett and Mr W Roberts. The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The text supplied is limited to the remedy judgment and does not repeat the tribunal's underlying liability reasoning.
The tribunal ordered Yorkshire Grown Produce Ltd to pay Ms T Compa £23,382.52. The award was broken down as £6,864.19 for loss of earnings, a 10% uplift of £686.42 for unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures, interest of £448.49 on the loss of earnings award, £12,500 for injury to feelings, a further 10% uplift of £1,250, and interest of £1,633.42 on the injury to feelings award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The supplied PDF text is a remedy judgment only; the underlying liability reasons were given orally at the hearing and are not repeated in the written record. | Upheld | Age | £23,383 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £23,383
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £7,551
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.