Case 1805241/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Kay Mr J Smith Mr S Lapping v GRP Building Solutions Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805241/2021
- Decision date
- 27 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Kay Mr J Smith Mr S Lapping
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment in linked cases 1805241/2021, 1805242/2021 and 1805243/2021 heard at Sheffield by CVP on 4 April 2022 before Employment Judge Brain. None of the claimants attended or were represented, and the respondent also did not attend.
The tribunal recorded that, after considering all of the information available to it and making such enquiries of the claimants as were applicable, the claims failed and were dismissed. The written record does not set out any further findings of fact or legal analysis.
The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in accordance with the usual tribunal procedure.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The written record is a short oral judgment and does not specify the individual claim particulars; it states only that the claims fail and stand dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The written record is a short oral judgment and does not specify the individual claim particulars; it states only that the claims fail and stand dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.