Case 1805243/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Hattersley v Nationwide Crash Repair Centres Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1805243/2019
- Decision date
- 30 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eeley
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Hattersley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Hull on 30 January 2020 before Employment Judge Eeley sitting alone. The judgment first amended the respondent's name to Nationwide Crash Repair Centres Ltd.
The claimant's claim for a redundancy payment failed and was dismissed. His claim of unfair dismissal also failed and was dismissed. The judgment records those outcomes without setting out detailed factual reasons.
The claimant's claim for notice pay as a result of wrongful dismissal succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £6,759 gross in respect of twelve weeks' statutory notice pay. The claimant's claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim for notice pay as a result of wrongful dismissal. | Upheld | — | £6,759 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,759
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.