Case 1805286/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Antosiak Mr R Maceikis Mr A Pelich Mrs O Ogilbiene v Mach Recruitment Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805286/2019
- Decision date
- 21 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright’s
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Antosiak Mr R Maceikis Mr A Pelich Mrs O Ogilbiene
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that Employment Judge Wright had issued a strike out warning on 10 June 2021. After that warning, no response or communications were received from any of the claimants.
Employment Judge Webster struck out the remaining claims under Rule 37(d) on the basis that they had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not address remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the remaining claims were struck out under Rule 37(d) because they had not been actively pursued. The claim type is identified from the listing category rather than detail in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the remaining claims were struck out under Rule 37(d) because they had not been actively pursued. The claim type is identified from the listing category rather than detail in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.