Case 1805287/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Booth First v A-Day Consultants Limited t/a Academics Second Respondent: Leading Learners Multi-Academy Trust Date: 7 February 2024 — 2024
- Case reference
- 1805287/2023
- Decision date
- 9 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Members
- Panel members
- Ms H Brown, Mr K Lannaman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Booth First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Leeds by CVP, heard the claimant's claim against A-Day Consultants Limited t/a Academics and Leading Learners Multi-Academy Trust. The written judgment records a unanimous decision of Employment Judge Shepherd, Ms H Brown and Mr K Lannaman.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claim for breach of the Agency Workers Regulations was not well-founded and dismissed it. The written record does not set out further reasons or any separate findings on remedy.
The judgment notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time. On the face of the written record, there was no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agency worker regulations | The written record contains only the disposal: the tribunal unanimously held that the claimant's claim for breach of the Agency Workers Regulations was not well-founded and dismissed it. No written reasons are included in this record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.