Case 1805291/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Cadbury, volunteer CAB adviser v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1805291/2019
- Decision date
- 4 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms Cadbury, volunteer CAB adviser
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only claim recorded in the extract was a complaint of failure to meet the duty to make adjustments, which falls within disability discrimination. The case was heard at a preliminary hearing in Leeds on 29 November 2019 before Employment Judge Cox, with the Claimant represented by Ms Cadbury, a volunteer CAB adviser, and the Respondent represented by Ms Kight, counsel.
The tribunal did not determine the claim on its merits. It recorded that the claim of failure to meet the duty to make adjustments was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. No factual findings, liability findings, or remedy assessment are set out in the extract.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 4 December 2019. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The claim of failure to meet the duty to make adjustments was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant at a preliminary hearing on 29 November 2019. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.