Case 1805293/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Norris v Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1805293/2020
- Decision date
- 18 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Norris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a case management order dated 11 November 2020, Employment Judge Davies gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant was ordered to write to the Tribunal by 18 November 2020 to explain why she did not join the telephone hearing.
The claimant did not make any written representations and did not contact the Tribunal at all. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim pursuant to Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. The judgment records no substantive determination of the merits and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim types; it records only that 'the claim' was struck out for non-pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.