Case 1805299/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Bowett v DP Publicity Limited AT A HEARING — 2019
- Case reference
- 1805299/2019
- Decision date
- 28 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Bowett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at Leeds on 27 November 2019 before Employment Judge Lancaster. The claimant, Mrs R Bowett, appeared in person and the respondent, DP Publicity Limited, was represented by Miss E Walker, solicitor.
The judgment records that the complaints of pregnancy and maternity discrimination, direct sex discrimination, and failure to comply with the employer’s duties in relation to a flexible working application were dismissed upon withdrawal. No findings of fact or merits analysis are set out in the text provided beyond the record that the complaints were withdrawn.
No remedy or financial award is recorded in the judgment. The decision was sent to the parties on 28 November 2019.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment records that the pregnancy and maternity discrimination complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that the direct sex discrimination complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Flexible working | The judgment records that the complaint about failure to comply with the employer’s duties in relation to a flexible working application was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.