Case 1805314/2022 · Employment Tribunal
B Isherwood v James Phillip Projects Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1805314/2022
- Decision date
- 15 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
B Isherwood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 25 September 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the tribunal made a determination under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a contested hearing. The hearing listed for 16 December 2022 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £1,080. It also found a breach of contract in respect of accrued expenses and bonuses and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £111.45.
The judgment directed that both sums be paid on or before 30 November 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,080 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was "dismissed in breach of contract in respect of accrued expenses and bonuses" and awards damages of £111.45. | Upheld | — | £111 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,191
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.