Mr F Thurman v Decormax Ltd — 2021

Case reference: 1805331/2020
Decision date: 3 February 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr F Thurman

Respondent

Decormax Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claimant, Mr F Thurman, did not attend the hearing on 22 January 2021. The tribunal noted that he had also failed to attend the hearing listed for 12 November 2020 and had not replied to the Employment Tribunal's letter of 17 December 2020 requiring him to show cause why the complaint should not be struck out for not being actively pursued.

Employment Judge Brain held that the claimant was not actively pursuing his complaint and, in any event, that the complaint had no reasonable prospect of success. For those reasons, the complaint was struck out. No remedy was awarded.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The extracted text does not identify the substantive nature of the complaint; the judgment refers only to the claimant's complaint. It was struck out because the claimant was not actively pursuing it and, in any event, it had no reasonable prospect of success.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.