Case 1805344/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person v Mr C B Mowforth, Managing Director — 2020
- Case reference
- 1805344/2019
- Decision date
- 18 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rogerson Representation
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Hull on 12 February 2020 before Employment Judge Rogerson, the tribunal dealt with a claim by Mr R Newton against Spalding Golf Centre Limited. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr C B Mowforth, Managing Director.
The tribunal found that the claimant had suffered an unauthorised deduction of wages and that he had not received the correct rate of holiday pay for 8.5 days of accrued holiday. The parties agreed that the sum outstanding was £156.91, and the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay that amount to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant had suffered an unauthorised deduction of wages. The amount awarded was not split between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had not been paid the correct rate of holiday pay for 8.5 days of accrued holiday. The amount awarded was not split between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £157
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.