Case 1805357/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Sorensen (solicitor) For the v Mr Steel (solicitor) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1805357/2019
- Decision date
- 27 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Appearances
- Venue
- By telephone
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Sorensen (solicitor) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis preliminary hearing was held by telephone on 27 April 2020 before Employment Judge Davies. The claimant was represented by Mr Sorensen and the respondent by Mr Steel. The tribunal recorded that the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages for the period prior to 9 December 2018 and the unfair dismissal complaint were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment does not contain findings on the merits of those two claims or any remedy award. It states that the remaining claims were to proceed in accordance with the case management orders made at the hearing on 27 April 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages for the period prior to 9 December 2018 was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.