Case 1805358/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B Elmes v TGF3 Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1805358/2020
- Decision date
- 7 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B Elmes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at Sheffield on 1 June 2021 before Employment Judge Brain, found that the TUPE Regulations 2006 were not engaged at the material time. It then upheld Mrs B Elmes's complaint of unfair dismissal against TGF3 Limited.
On remedy, the tribunal ordered a basic award of £1,259.65 and a compensatory award. The judgment records two weeks' net loss of earnings of £520.60 and a 25% reduction for contributory conduct of £130.15, giving a net compensatory figure of £390.45. The order states a compensatory award of £390.46, and the total sum ordered was £1,650.10 payable on or before 15 June 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The tribunal found that the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 were not engaged at the material time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal complaint and made a basic award and compensatory award. The compensatory figure was reduced by 25% for contributory conduct. | Upheld | — | £1,650 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,650
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,260
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £390
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.