Case 1805362/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Misiunas (1) Ms J Momgaudiene (2) v AVC Logistics Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1805362/2019
- Decision date
- 24 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Misiunas (1) Ms J Momgaudiene (2)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short Rule 52 withdrawal judgment in consolidated cases 1805362/2019 and 1805420/2019 before Employment Judge JM Wade. The tribunal recorded that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claims by the claimants.
No substantive findings were made on the underlying employment issues, and the judgment records no liability findings or monetary award. The decision is limited to the procedural disposal of the proceedings after withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records dismissal after withdrawal of the claims by the claimants; the PDF text does not separate the pleaded heads. This claim type is taken from the supplied case context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Mapped from the supplied case-context category 'National Minimum Wage'; the PDF text itself only records dismissal after withdrawal of the claims by the claimants. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records dismissal after withdrawal of the claims by the claimants; the PDF text does not separate the pleaded heads. This claim type is taken from the supplied case context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records dismissal after withdrawal of the claims by the claimants; the PDF text does not separate the pleaded heads. This claim type is taken from the supplied case context. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.